EUDR Exception for Bovine Leather: Relief with Open Questions

vegetably tanned cowhide | vegetable-tanned goatskin | vegetable-tanned sheepskin | full-grain leather | full-grain leather | Swiss leather | chrome-free full-grain leather | buy natural leather
 

The EUDR – the EU Deforestation Regulation – has long caused uncertainty in the leather industry. A recent development is all the more remarkable: bovine leather is to be exempted from the scope of the regulation.

The reasoning is clear and addresses a central point: leather is not considered a driver of deforestation, but rather emerges as a byproduct of the meat industry. Simultaneously, the leather value chain is largely decoupled from the meat market. Tanneries and brands have little economic influence on where and how cattle are raised. The leverage lies not in leather processing, but in agriculture.

The EU thus acknowledges a reality that is often palpable in practice: even when greater transparency is desired, it can only be enforced to a limited extent throughout the upstream supply chain. The decision is also understandable from a market perspective. Regulating leather but not finished leather products would create an imbalance without actually preventing deforestation.

What does this mean for the industry? Above all, relief. The direct obligation for complete traceability is removed. However, the fundamental question remains:

Where does the material come from – and under what conditions was it processed?

Regulation establishes a framework. However, true responsibility extends beyond this. Those who take it seriously build transparent supply chains wherever they can exert influence, irrespective of legal requirements.

vegetable-tanned leather | natural leather from Switzerland | chrome-free leather | regional leather | sustainable leather production | sustainable leather from Switzerland | vegetable-tanned leather | leather with traceability
 
Back
Back

Regional = sustainable?

Continue
Continue

Regional Leather is becoming CORII